Noometry

Model comparison

o1-mini vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 20 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

33.7

Rank #230 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.0

Rank #66 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 20 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3.7 Plus in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 38.4 to 8.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 46.9% for o1-mini and 93.3% for Qwen3.7 Plus.

Side by side

o1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index33.745.0
Released2024-09-122026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked3932

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 35.1 (#218), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.1 (#200)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding13621473
FrontierCode—10.2%
Aider Polyglot32.9%—
SciCode—45.5%
WeirdML36.3%—
LiveBench Coding48%—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 24.3 (#112), Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.2 (#130)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%
Cybench10%—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 8.9 (#340), Qwen3.7 Plus: 38.4 (#54)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts13331460
Epoch Capabilities Index135.82147.39
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench18.1%—
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
ARC-AGI-114%—
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%—
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA—37.6%
LiveBench57.8%—

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 33.7 (#168), Qwen3.7 Plus: 49.3 (#47)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202546.9%93.3%
LMArena Math13581467
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
LiveBench Math62%—
MATH Level 589.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 34.8 (#180), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#46)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
GPQA Diamond62.4%87.9%
LMArena Expert13161467
Confabulations18.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

o1-mini: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.2 (#30)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1281
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 43.8 (#177), Qwen3.7 Plus: 55.0 (#36)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English12891445
LMArena Chinese13141510
LMArena French12921471
LMArena German12781471
LMArena Japanese12451411
LMArena Korean12231416
LMArena Russian12831457
LMArena Spanish13021453

Instruction Following Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 67.0 (#200), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.9 (#49)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following13041439
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%—

Long Context Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 40.1 (#156), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#61)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query13211454

Writing & Preference Qwen3.7 Plus leads

o1-mini: 48.6 (#196), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.5 (#54)

Benchmarko1-miniQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text13171454
LMArena Creative Writing12441439
LMArena Multi-Turn13141459
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%—
LiveBench Language40.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.7 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.0 to 33.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1-mini or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.7 Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 35.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

20 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper