Model comparison

o1-mini vs Qwen3 8B

o1-mini and Qwen3 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.0 vs 33.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Qwen3 8B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.7

Rank #238 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3 8B in 3 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3 8B leads 16.6 to 8.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 46.9% for o1-mini and 56.1% for Qwen3 8B.
  • Qwen3 8B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-mini and Qwen3 8B specifications
o1-miniQwen3 8B
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index34.033.7
Released2024-09-122025-04
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.18
Output $ / M tokens—$0.70
Results tracked3911

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 35.5 (#224), Qwen3 8B: 34.0 (#248)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniQwen3 8B
Aider Polyglot32.9%—
SciCode—22.6%
WeirdML36.3%—
LiveBench Coding48%—
LMArena Coding1362—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3 8B leads

o1-mini: 24.6 (#118), Qwen3 8B: 30.2 (#78)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniQwen3 8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—42.6%
Cybench10%—

Reasoning Qwen3 8B leads

o1-mini: 8.8 (#346), Qwen3 8B: 16.6 (#303)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniQwen3 8B
Epoch Capabilities Index135.82136.17
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench18.1%—
ARC-AGI-114%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—5%
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1333—
DTBench—59.7%
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
LMCA—8.8%
LiveBench57.8%—

Math Too close to call

o1-mini: 35.4 (#186), Qwen3 8B: 34.9 (#191)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniQwen3 8B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202546.9%56.1%
LiveBench Math62%—
LMArena Math1358—
MATH Level 589.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Qwen3 8B leads

o1-mini: 34.9 (#192), Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#173)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniQwen3 8B
GPQA Diamond62.4%56.8%
Confabulations18.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.8%
LMArena Expert1316—

Multilingual Not comparable

o1-mini: 43.6 (#182), Qwen3 8B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniQwen3 8B
LMArena Non-English1289—
LMArena Chinese1314—
LMArena French1293—
LMArena German1278—
LMArena Japanese1245—
LMArena Korean1223—
LMArena Russian1283—
LMArena Spanish1303—

Instruction Following Not comparable

o1-mini: 66.7 (#206), Qwen3 8B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniQwen3 8B
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%—
LMArena Instruction Following1304—

Long Context o1-mini leads

o1-mini: 40.1 (#161), Qwen3 8B: 37.9 (#210)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniQwen3 8B
Fiction.LiveBench—62.1%
LMArena Longer Query1320—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

o1-mini: 48.4 (#202), Qwen3 8B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniQwen3 8B
LMArena Text1317—
LMArena Creative Writing1244—
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1314—
LiveBench Language40.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than Qwen3 8B?

o1-mini and Qwen3 8B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.0 vs 33.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is o1-mini or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

o1-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.5 versus 34.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Qwen3 8B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper