Model comparison

o1-mini vs Step 3

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.

o1-mini OpenAI

34.0

Rank #235 Confirmed

Step 3 StepFun

40.5

Rank #149 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. o1-mini scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 3 leads 28.4 to 8.8.
  • Step 3 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o1-mini and Step 3 specifications
o1-miniStep 3
ProviderOpenAIStepFun
Noometry Index34.040.5
Released2024-09-12—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked3917

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 35.5 (#224), Step 3: 40.1 (#147)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Coding13621367
Aider Polyglot32.9%—
WeirdML36.3%—
LiveBench Coding48%—
HumanEval+89%—
MBPP+78.8%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o1-mini: 24.6 (#118), Step 3: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
Cybench10%—

Reasoning Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 8.8 (#346), Step 3: 28.4 (#105)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Hard Prompts13331355
ARC-AGI-20.8%—
SimpleBench18.1%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark—62.3%
ARC-AGI-114%—
LiveBench Reasoning72.3%—
LiveBench Data Analysis57.9%—
Epoch Capabilities Index135.82—
LiveBench57.8%—

Math Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 35.4 (#186), Step 3: 37.6 (#148)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Math13581366
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202546.9%—
LiveBench Math62%—
MATH Level 589.2%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)1.7%—

Knowledge Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 34.9 (#192), Step 3: 36.8 (#164)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Expert13161333
GPQA Diamond62.4%—
Confabulations18.6%—

Multimodal Not comparable

o1-mini: —, Step 3: 35.5 (#86)

Multimodal benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Vision—1177

Multilingual Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 43.6 (#182), Step 3: 46.3 (#159)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Non-English12891327
LMArena Chinese13141397
LMArena German12781371
LMArena Korean12231269
LMArena Russian12831331
LMArena Spanish13031371
LMArena French1293—
LMArena Japanese1245—

Instruction Following Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 66.7 (#206), Step 3: 70.4 (#164)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Instruction Following13041332
LiveBench Instruction Following65.4%—

Long Context Too close to call

o1-mini: 40.1 (#161), Step 3: 40.3 (#157)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Longer Query13201326

Writing & Preference Step 3 leads

o1-mini: 48.4 (#202), Step 3: 54.3 (#151)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko1-miniStep 3
LMArena Text13171350
LMArena Creative Writing12441321
LMArena Multi-Turn13141341
Short-Story Creative Writing64.9%—
LiveBench Language40.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o1-mini better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 34.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is o1-mini or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o1-mini and Step 3 share?

15 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-mini has 39 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper