Model comparison
o1-pro vs Qwen3.5 Plus
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 Plus leads 46.0 to 29.7.
- Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper at $0.40 / $2.40 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- Qwen3.5 Plus accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| o1-pro | Qwen3.5 Plus | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2025-03-19 | 2026-02-16 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 100K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $150 | $0.40 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $600 | $2.40 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 15 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ALE-Bench | — | 621.92 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: —
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 0.54 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Plus leads
o1-pro: 20.4 (#239), Qwen3.5 Plus: 32.8 (#74)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 17% |
| DTBench | — | 80.5% |
| LMCA | — | 36.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 146.78 |
Math Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 49.6 (#61)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 21% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 2.1% |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Plus leads
o1-pro: 29.7 (#234), Qwen3.5 Plus: 46.0 (#83)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 84.8% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 25.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 10.7% |
Long Context Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.5 Plus: 43.0 (#113)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.5 Plus |
|---|---|---|
| CL-bench | — | 19.8% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 12.4% |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-pro better than Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.9 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Qwen3.5 Plus?
Qwen3.5 Plus is cheaper. It lists at $0.40 per million input tokens and $2.40 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.5 Plus does, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen3.5 Plus share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Plus has 15.