Model comparison
o1-pro vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 54.4 to 20.4.
- Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper at $2 / $6 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- Qwen3.8 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 200K.
Side by side
| o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 31.5 | 56.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-19 | 2026-08-02 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 200K | 1M |
| Max output | 100K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $150 | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $600 | $6 |
| Results tracked | 3 | 39 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1674 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 17.8% |
| SciCode | — | 53.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1502 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 63.3% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads
o1-pro: 20.4 (#239), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 23.3% | — |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EnigmaEval | 6.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1496 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| DTBench | — | 92% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.41 |
Math Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 100% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1499 |
Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads
o1-pro: 29.7 (#234), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 92.7% |
| Humanity's Last Exam | 8.1% | — |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1507 |
Multimodal Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |
Multilingual Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1472 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1538 |
| LMArena French | — | 1503 |
| LMArena German | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1467 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1461 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1481 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1492 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1479 |
Long Context Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1489 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
o1-pro: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)
| Benchmark | o1-pro | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1483 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1479 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1489 |
Frequently asked questions
Is o1-pro better than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, o1-pro or Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is cheaper. It lists at $2 per million input tokens and $6 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3.8 Max does, with 1M tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do o1-pro and Qwen3.8 Max share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o1-pro has 3 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.