Model comparison

o3-mini vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

o3-mini OpenAI

36.7

Rank #205 Confirmed

Qwen1.5 4b Chat Alibaba (Qwen)

28.3

Rank #319 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. o3-mini scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5 4b Chat in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where o3-mini leads 50.4 to 23.9.
  • Qwen1.5 4b Chat has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

o3-mini and Qwen1.5 4b Chat specifications
o3-miniQwen1.5 4b Chat
ProviderOpenAIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index36.728.3
Released2024-12-20—
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window200K—
Max output100K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.10—
Output $ / M tokens$4.40—
Results tracked5113

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 41.4 (#116), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 28.6 (#305)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Coding1378999
Aider Polyglot60.4%—
SciCode39.8%—
GSO1.3%—
WeirdML43.7%—
LiveBench Coding82.7%—
CadEval54%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

o3-mini: 29.3 (#79), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen1.5 4b Chat
Cybench22.5%—

Reasoning Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads

o3-mini: 16.3 (#295), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 17.7 (#277)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Hard Prompts1366976
ARC-AGI-23%—
SimpleBench22.8%—
ARC-AGI-134.5%—
CritPt0.3%—
Chess Puzzles17%—
LiveBench Reasoning89.6%—
Mystery Game Puzzles7%—
DTBench68.8%—
LiveBench Data Analysis70.6%—
LMCA19%—
Epoch Capabilities Index140.35—
ForecastBench59.6—
LiveBench75.9%—

Math Too close to call

o3-mini: 27.6 (#236), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 27.9 (#233)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Math13961026
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)18.6%—
FrontierMath Tier 40%—
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202576.9%—
LiveBench Math77.3%—
MATH Level 596.5%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)12.4%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—

Knowledge o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 38.3 (#135), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.2 (#252)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Expert1364980
GPQA Diamond77%—
SimpleQA Verified15.3%—
Confabulations17.9%—

Multilingual o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 45.9 (#159), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Non-English1319979
LMArena Chinese13791024
LMArena German1303902
LMArena Russian1304952
LMArena French1333—
LMArena Japanese1286—
LMArena Korean1314—
LMArena Spanish1321—

Instruction Following o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 75.3 (#67), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.3 (#295)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Instruction Following1338979
LiveBench Instruction Following84.4%—

Long Context o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 33.8 (#251), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#285)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Longer Query1343988
Fiction.LiveBench50%—

Writing & Preference o3-mini leads

o3-mini: 50.4 (#177), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.9 (#304)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarko3-miniQwen1.5 4b Chat
LMArena Text1337997
LMArena Creative Writing1286969
LMArena Multi-Turn1320977
Short-Story Creative Writing61.7%—
LiveBench Language50.7%—

Frequently asked questions

Is o3-mini better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?

o3-mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.7 to 28.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is o3-mini or Qwen1.5 4b Chat better for coding?

o3-mini scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.4 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do o3-mini and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-mini has 51 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper