Model comparison
o3-pro vs Wizardlm 70b
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in long context, where o3-pro leads 72.1 to 33.3.
- Wizardlm 70b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| o3-pro | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 42.7 | 32.4 |
| Released | 2025-06-10 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 200K | — |
| Max output | 100K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $20 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $80 | — |
| Results tracked | 12 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 55.1 (#22), Wizardlm 70b: 30.9 (#280)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | 84.9% | — |
| WeirdML | 58.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1081 |
Reasoning o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 24.1 (#152), Wizardlm 70b: 19.8 (#231)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4.9% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 72.1% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 59.3% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1079 |
| DTBench | 86.9% | — |
| LMCA | 38.5% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 147.43 | — |
Math Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.7 (#216)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
o3-pro: 29.0 (#234), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Confabulations | 14.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 23.3% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 29.8 (#260)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1052 |
| LMArena German | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1155 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
o3-pro: —, Wizardlm 70b: 56.5 (#268)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1093 |
Long Context o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 72.1 (#1), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#258)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 97.2% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1097 |
Writing & Preference o3-pro leads
o3-pro: 57.1 (#128), Wizardlm 70b: 34.9 (#264)
| Benchmark | o3-pro | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1149 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 84.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is o3-pro better than Wizardlm 70b?
o3-pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 32.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is o3-pro or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
o3-pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 55.1 versus 30.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do o3-pro and Wizardlm 70b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. o3-pro has 12 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.