Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Olmo 7b Instruct
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 5 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads 42.3 to 26.0.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 32.2 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.6 (#222), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1016 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 22.6 (#174), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 993 |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 24.8 (#255), Olmo 7b Instruct: 27.8 (#234)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1018 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.2 (#274), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.0 (#243), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.1 (#286)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 977 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1013 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 946 |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.8 (#238), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.3 (#296)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 978 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#229), Olmo 7b Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.3 (#231), Olmo 7b Instruct: 26.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Olmo 7b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1032 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 990 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1007 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Olmo 7b Instruct?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.6 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Olmo 7b Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.