Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen1.5-14B
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen1.5-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.7 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher in 6 categories and Qwen1.5-14B in 2 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5-14B leads 29.8 to 19.5.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 32.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | 1138 |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | 1113 |
Math Qwen1.5-14B leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1208 | 1125 |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
Knowledge Qwen1.5-14B leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1094 |
| MMLU | — | 68.6% |
Multilingual Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | 1095 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | 1147 |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | 1046 |
| LMArena French | — | 1116 |
| LMArena German | — | 1043 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1019 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1085 |
Instruction Following Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | 1102 |
| IFEval | 78% | — |
Long Context Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | 1113 |
Writing & Preference Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen1.5-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | 1128 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | 1110 |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen1.5-14B?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen1.5-14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.7 vs 32.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen1.5-14B better for coding?
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 33.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen1.5-14B share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-14B has 17.