Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 19.5.
- Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 39.9 |
| Released | — | 2026-07-15 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.03 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.13 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Qwen3.7 Flash: 28.2 (#108)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 43.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 23% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 15% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.64 |
Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Qwen3.7 Flash: 38.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 19.3% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 86.7% |
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#75)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 82.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Qwen3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.