Model comparison
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 34.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 16 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 35.2 (#227), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1210 | — |
Reasoning Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 23.6 (#175), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1208 | — |
Math Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 26.8 (#255), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | 16.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1208 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 19.5 (#279), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | 41.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 28.7% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 34.8 (#248), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1160 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1192 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1187 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 61.5 (#244), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | 78% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1186 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 36.2 (#234), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1194 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct: 42.1 (#236), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1218 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1199 | — |
| WildBench | 73.4% | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1221 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.3 to 32.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 2 0325 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.