Model comparison

OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 29.6 to 18.0.

Side by side

OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct specifications
OLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index29.232.4
Released2024-12-31—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1217

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LiveBench Coding10.4%—
LMArena Coding—1130

Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LiveBench Reasoning16.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1127
LiveBench Data Analysis20.6%—
LiveBench22.1%—

Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Omni-MATH15.6%—
LiveBench Math13.6%—
LMArena Math—1173

Knowledge Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
MMLU-Pro31%—
GPQA (HELM)31.6%—
LMArena Expert—1108

Multilingual Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1094
LMArena Chinese—1108
LMArena French—1109
LMArena German—1101
LMArena Japanese—1042
LMArena Korean—954
LMArena Russian—1145
LMArena Spanish—1095

Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following60.6%—
IFEval73%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1114

Long Context Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1120

Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
LMArena Text—1138
LMArena Creative Writing—1106
WildBench68.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—1088
LiveBench Language11.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.2 on the Noometry Index.

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?

Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.

Related comparisons

Go deeper