Model comparison

OLMo 2 Furious 13B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct

OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads 42.9 to 27.1.

Side by side

OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct specifications
OLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Microsoft
Noometry Index29.729.7
Released2024-12-312024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1219

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.6%
LiveBench Coding10.4%—
LMArena Coding—1039
BigCodeBench Complete—40.6%

Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LiveBench Reasoning16.3%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1028
LiveBench Data Analysis20.6%—
LiveBench22.1%—

Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Omni-MATH15.6%—
LiveBench Math13.6%—
LMArena Math—1089

Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
MMLU-Pro31%—
GPQA (HELM)31.6%—
LMArena Expert—984

Multilingual Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1000
LMArena Chinese—1016
LMArena French—1039
LMArena German—1006
LMArena Japanese—899
LMArena Korean—856
LMArena Russian—1004
LMArena Spanish—1059

Instruction Following OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following60.6%—
IFEval73%—
LMArena Instruction Following—1023

Long Context Not comparable

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —, Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—996

Writing & Preference OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads

OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOLMo 2 Furious 13BPhi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
LMArena Text—1050
LMArena Creative Writing—1024
WildBench68.9%—
LMArena Multi-Turn—989
LiveBench Language11.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?

OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is OLMo 2 Furious 13B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (28.6 vs 28.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do OLMo 2 Furious 13B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper