Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs phi-3-medium 14B
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 35.4 to 9.1.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 38.8 | 29.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 16 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1346 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1322 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169), phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1307 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1275 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1304 | — |
| LMArena French | 1328 | — |
| LMArena German | 1283 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1206 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1268 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1337 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1298 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1312 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1264 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1309 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.