Model comparison

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct vs Yi-34B

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.

Yi-34B 01.AI

27.4

Rank #325 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher in 8 categories and Yi-34B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 35.4 to 7.5.

Side by side

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Yi-34B specifications
Olmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-34B
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)01.AI
Noometry Index38.827.4
Released—2023-11-02
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1623

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 38.9 (#154), Yi-34B: 31.8 (#269)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Coding13461112

Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 25.4 (#131), Yi-34B: 20.3 (#222)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Hard Prompts13221104
BIG-Bench Hard—71.7%
Epoch Capabilities Index—117.28

Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 33.6 (#169), Yi-34B: 19.8 (#277)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Math13051114
MATH Level 5—5.1%
GSM8K—76%

Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 35.4 (#175), Yi-34B: 7.5 (#304)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Expert13071061
GPQA Diamond—14.7%
MMLU—76.3%

Multilingual Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.8 (#185), Yi-34B: 29.9 (#259)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Non-English12751079
LMArena Chinese13041175
LMArena French13281080
LMArena German12831042
LMArena Korean1206959
LMArena Russian12681050
LMArena Spanish13371070
LMArena Japanese—993

Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.8 (#182), Yi-34B: 56.4 (#269)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Instruction Following12981091

Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#161), Yi-34B: 33.2 (#259)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Longer Query13121094

Writing & Preference Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.4 (#179), Yi-34B: 34.3 (#268)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 3.1 32b InstructYi-34B
LMArena Text13111129
LMArena Creative Writing12641108
LMArena Multi-Turn13091113

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better than Yi-34B?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct or Yi-34B better for coding?

Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct and Yi-34B share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16 scored results on Noometry and Yi-34B has 23.

Related comparisons

Go deeper