Model comparison
Olmo 3.1 32b Think vs Step 3.7 Flash
Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in math, where Step 3.7 Flash leads 42.9 to 36.3.
Side by side
| Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Step 3.7 Flash | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 37.9 | 37.3 |
| Released | — | 2026-05-29 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 256K |
| Max output | — | 256K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.18 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.11 |
| Results tracked | 15 | 5 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 37.7 (#189), Step 3.7 Flash: 40.0 (#150)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 40% |
| LMArena Coding | 1291 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 694.12 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Think leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 25.2 (#150), Step 3.7 Flash: 21.6 (#219)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 39.7% |
| CritPt | — | 2.3% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1272 | — |
Math Step 3.7 Flash leads
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 36.3 (#168), Step 3.7 Flash: 42.9 (#82)
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | — | 68.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1305 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 35.7 (#181), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1295 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.1 (#231), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1209 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1242 | — |
| LMArena French | 1260 | — |
| LMArena German | 1262 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1193 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1289 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 65.6 (#218), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1247 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 38.6 (#195), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1272 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 3.1 32b Think: 46.2 (#220), Step 3.7 Flash: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 3.1 32b Think | Step 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1226 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1252 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think better than Step 3.7 Flash?
Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Step 3.7 Flash score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.9 vs 37.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Olmo 3.1 32b Think or Step 3.7 Flash better for coding?
Step 3.7 Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 37.7 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 3.1 32b Think and Step 3.7 Flash share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 3.1 32b Think has 15 scored results on Noometry and Step 3.7 Flash has 5.