Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs phi-3-medium 14B
Olmo 7b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 36.8 to 29.6.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1018 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Olmo 7b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.