Model comparison
Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Olmo 7b Instruct leads 30.2 to 16.2.
Side by side
| Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.3 | 30.1 |
| Released | — | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5 32B Instruct leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 38.7 (#169)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 45% |
| LMArena Coding | 1016 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 52.3% |
Reasoning Too close to call
Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 19.2 (#266)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 993 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 128.52 |
Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads
Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 16.2 (#296)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1018 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.1% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: 24.9 (#266)
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 46.1% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 977 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1014 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 947 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 978 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen2.5 32B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Olmo 7b Instruct | Qwen2.5 32B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1032 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 990 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1007 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen2.5 32B Instruct?
Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.3 vs 30.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen2.5 32B Instruct better for coding?
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 32B Instruct has 7.