Model comparison

Olmo 7b Instruct vs Qwen3.8 Max

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.8 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

56.8

Rank #22 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Olmo 7b Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.2 to 30.2.
  • Olmo 7b Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen3.8 Max specifications
Olmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
ProviderAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.356.8
Released—2026-08-02
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$2
Output $ / M tokens—$6
Results tracked1039

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.8 Max leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.5 (#29)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Coding10161502
DeepSWE—57.5%
LMArena WebDev—1674
FrontierSWE—17.8%
SciCode—53.2%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.4 (#14)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
APEX-Agents—63.3%
τ²-bench Banking—55.1%
GDP.pdf—23.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274), Qwen3.8 Max: 54.4 (#26)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Hard Prompts9931496
NYT Connections (extended)—88.3%
CritPt—20%
Chess Puzzles—40%
Mystery Game Puzzles—38%
DTBench—92%
LMCA—46.2%
Epoch Capabilities Index—156.41

Math Qwen3.8 Max leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.2 (#20)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Math10181499
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—74.7%
FrontierMath Tier 4—46.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—100%
ProofBench—58%

Knowledge Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#27)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
GPQA Diamond—92.7%
SimpleQA Verified—47.3%
LMArena Expert—1507

Multimodal Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 37.2 (#75)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Vision—1314
Furniture Assembly—20%

Multilingual Qwen3.8 Max leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291), Qwen3.8 Max: 56.7 (#18)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Non-English9771472
LMArena Chinese10141538
LMArena Russian9471481
LMArena French—1503
LMArena German—1483
LMArena Japanese—1467
LMArena Korean—1461
LMArena Spanish—1492

Instruction Following Qwen3.8 Max leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301), Qwen3.8 Max: 77.6 (#17)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Instruction Following9781479

Long Context Not comparable

Olmo 7b Instruct: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.6 (#31)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1489

Writing & Preference Qwen3.8 Max leads

Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303), Qwen3.8 Max: 67.1 (#30)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkOlmo 7b InstructQwen3.8 Max
LMArena Text10321483
LMArena Creative Writing9901479
LMArena Multi-Turn10071489

Frequently asked questions

Is Olmo 7b Instruct better than Qwen3.8 Max?

Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.8 to 30.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Olmo 7b Instruct or Qwen3.8 Max better for coding?

Qwen3.8 Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.5 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Olmo 7b Instruct and Qwen3.8 Max share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Olmo 7b Instruct has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 39.

Related comparisons

Go deeper