Model comparison
Palm 2 vs phi-3-medium 14B
Palm 2 and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 36.8 to 29.0.
- phi-3-medium 14B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 29.7 |
| Released | — | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 37.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 994 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Not comparable
Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.23 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |
| WinoGrande | — | 81.5% |
Math Palm 2 leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 91.6% |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), phi-3-medium 14B: —
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than phi-3-medium 14B?
Palm 2 and phi-3-medium 14B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (30.0 vs 29.7), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Palm 2 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.8 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and phi-3-medium 14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.