Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads 30.8 to 21.1.
- Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 32.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 28.5 (#306), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 995 | 1130 |
Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 18.2 (#270), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 20.8 (#214)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1127 |
Math Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 28.4 (#229), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.9 (#202)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1173 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 29.6 (#226)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1108 |
Multilingual Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 21.1 (#290), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.8 (#258)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1108 |
| LMArena French | — | 1109 |
| LMArena German | — | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1095 |
Instruction Following Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 51.3 (#291), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.8 (#263)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1114 |
Long Context Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 30.7 (#280), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.9 (#250)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1120 |
Writing & Preference Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Palm 2: 25.7 (#299), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.3 (#267)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1106 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.4 to 29.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Palm 2 or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.3 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.