Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Qwen1.5-72B
Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen1.5-72B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Qwen1.5-72B leads 33.4 to 21.1.
- Qwen1.5-72B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-72B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 29.4 | 30.3 |
| Released | — | 2024-02-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 10 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-72B leads
Palm 2: 28.5 (#306), Qwen1.5-72B: 31.4 (#272)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 995 | 1166 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 33.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.3% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 59.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 61.6% |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-72B leads
Palm 2: 18.2 (#270), Qwen1.5-72B: 21.2 (#201)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1148 |
Math Qwen1.5-72B leads
Palm 2: 28.4 (#229), Qwen1.5-72B: 30.7 (#205)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1164 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen1.5-72B: 11.5 (#295)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 28.8% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1136 |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-72B leads
Palm 2: 21.1 (#290), Qwen1.5-72B: 33.4 (#248)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1135 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | — | 1158 |
| LMArena German | — | 1084 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1061 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1049 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1104 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1110 |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-72B leads
Palm 2: 51.3 (#291), Qwen1.5-72B: 59.6 (#251)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1142 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-72B leads
Palm 2: 30.7 (#280), Qwen1.5-72B: 35.0 (#238)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1157 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-72B leads
Palm 2: 25.7 (#299), Qwen1.5-72B: 37.4 (#253)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen1.5-72B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1166 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1137 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1160 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Qwen1.5-72B?
Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-72B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.4 vs 30.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Palm 2 or Qwen1.5-72B better for coding?
Qwen1.5-72B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 28.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen1.5-72B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-72B has 22.