Model comparison
Palm 2 vs Qwen3 32B
Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Palm 2 scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 32B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3 32B leads 52.9 to 25.6.
- Qwen3 32B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Palm 2 | Qwen3 32B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 39.2 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.70 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Results tracked | 10 | 26 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 32B leads
Palm 2: 29.0 (#311), Qwen3 32B: 37.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 994 | 1358 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 40% |
| SciCode | — | 35.4% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen3 32B: 32.6 (#62)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 48.7% |
Reasoning Qwen3 32B leads
Palm 2: 19.1 (#271), Qwen3 32B: 20.2 (#241)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1005 | 1334 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 54.9% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| DTBench | — | 67.5% |
| LMCA | — | 17.3% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.51 |
Math Qwen3 32B leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#231), Qwen3 32B: 39.7 (#99)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1049 | 1399 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.9% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Palm 2: —, Qwen3 32B: 40.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 65.7% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.9% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1362 |
Multilingual Qwen3 32B leads
Palm 2: 20.9 (#295), Qwen3 32B: 45.6 (#167)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 916 | 1317 |
| LMArena Chinese | 887 | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1341 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1311 |
Instruction Following Qwen3 32B leads
Palm 2: 51.0 (#296), Qwen3 32B: 68.9 (#179)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1010 | 1305 |
Long Context Qwen3 32B leads
Palm 2: 30.8 (#285), Qwen3 32B: 43.8 (#87)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1010 | 1327 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 74.2% |
Writing & Preference Qwen3 32B leads
Palm 2: 25.6 (#304), Qwen3 32B: 52.9 (#163)
| Benchmark | Palm 2 | Qwen3 32B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1027 | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 991 | 1297 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 994 | 1331 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Palm 2 better than Qwen3 32B?
Qwen3 32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.2 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Palm 2 or Qwen3 32B better for coding?
Qwen3 32B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.7 versus 29.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Palm 2 and Qwen3 32B share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Palm 2 has 10 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 32B has 26.