Model comparison
phi-3-medium 14B vs Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct
phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 29.9 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-09 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2.80 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $8.40 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 18.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OSWorld | — | 5% |
Reasoning Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 20.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 36% |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.23 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306), Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: —
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct: 33.5 (#97)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1107 |
| Video-MME | — | 73.5% |
| GeoBench | — | 62% |
| SpatialViz-Bench | — | 33.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct?
phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (29.7 vs 29.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-VL 72B Instruct has 6.