Model comparison
phi-3-medium 14B vs Wizardlm 13b
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
MicrosoftSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where phi-3-medium 14B leads 36.3 to 29.6.
Side by side
| phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 29.1 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 13 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding phi-3-medium 14B leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 37.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 48.7% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |
| Adversarial NLI | 55.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 81.4% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 121.18 | — |
| HellaSwag | 82.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 81.5% | — |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |
| MATH Level 5 | 17.6% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 27.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 91.6% | — |
| MMLU | 78% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 87.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 73.9% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1049 |
Long Context Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
phi-3-medium 14B: —, Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | phi-3-medium 14B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is phi-3-medium 14B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is phi-3-medium 14B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
phi-3-medium 14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do phi-3-medium 14B and Wizardlm 13b share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. phi-3-medium 14B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.