Model comparison
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Pixtral Large
Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Pixtral Large leads 32.9 to 27.1.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Pixtral Large | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Mistral AI |
| Noometry Index | 29.7 | 32.2 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 128K |
| Max output | — | 128K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 19 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 29.6% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1039 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 40.6% | — |
Reasoning Pixtral Large leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Pixtral Large: 21.7 (#218)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.8% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1028 | — |
Math Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1089 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 984 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —, Pixtral Large: 30.6 (#111)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1089 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1000 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1016 | — |
| LMArena French | 1039 | — |
| LMArena German | 1006 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 899 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 856 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1004 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1059 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1023 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Pixtral Large: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 996 | — |
Writing & Preference Pixtral Large leads
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Pixtral Large: 32.9 (#278)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | Pixtral Large |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1050 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1024 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 988 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 989 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Pixtral Large?
Pixtral Large is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.2 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Pixtral Large share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Pixtral Large has 3.