Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct vs Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads 58.0 to 27.1.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct specifications
Phi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index29.743.0
Released2024-04-232025-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—33K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$2
Results tracked1925

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 42.5 (#98)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Coding10391440
BigCodeBench Instruct29.6%—
BigCodeBench Complete40.6%—

Reasoning Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 31.1 (#81)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts10281428
Kagi LLM Benchmark—66.7%

Math Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 38.8 (#126)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Math10891440
Omni-MATH—46.7%

Knowledge Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 41.8 (#106)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Expert9841417
MMLU-Pro—78.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—9.3%
GPQA (HELM)—63%

Multilingual Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 52.1 (#93)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Non-English10001407
LMArena Chinese10161460
LMArena French10391413
LMArena German10061417
LMArena Japanese8991395
LMArena Korean8561364
LMArena Russian10041404
LMArena Spanish10591435

Instruction Following Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 70.8 (#159)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following10231389
IFEval—81%

Long Context Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 37.0 (#223)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query9961403
Fiction.LiveBench—55.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct leads

Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301), Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct: 58.0 (#121)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 128k InstructQwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct
LMArena Text10501417
LMArena Creative Writing10241334
LMArena Multi-Turn9891416
WildBench—80.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better than Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.0 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct or Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct better for coding?

Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.5 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Next 80B-A3B Instruct has 25.

Related comparisons

Go deeper