Model comparison
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Qwen Turbo
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.4 vs 26.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Microsoft
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads 24.5 to 14.5.
- Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 27.4 | 26.8 |
| Released | 2024-04-23 | 2024-11-01 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.05 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.20 |
| Results tracked | 35 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 15.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1093 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 59.1% | — |
| MBPP+ | 54.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 26.8% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1072 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 34.7% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | 52.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 71.7% | — |
| HellaSwag | 76.7% | — |
| LiveBench | 22.4% | — |
| WinoGrande | 70.8% | — |
Math Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258), Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| LiveBench Math | 15.7% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1111 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct leads
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241), Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1045 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 84.9% | — |
| MMLU | 68.8% | — |
| OpenBookQA | 88% | — |
| TriviaQA | 64% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1021 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1021 | — |
| LMArena French | 1075 | — |
| LMArena German | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 935 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 905 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1022 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1084 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 39.1% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1053 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1044 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295), Qwen Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1037 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1018 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 9.2% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Qwen Turbo?
Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen Turbo score almost the same on the Noometry Index (27.4 vs 26.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen Turbo share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.