Model comparison

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct vs Qwen3.5-9B

Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct Microsoft

27.4

Rank #324 Confirmed

Qwen3.5-9B Alibaba (Qwen)

33.3

Rank #235 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5-9B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5-9B leads 46.0 to 27.9.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Chess Puzzles: 0% for Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and 12% for Qwen3.5-9B.

Side by side

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B specifications
Phi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index27.433.3
Released2024-04-232026-02-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.15
Results tracked3510

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.1 (#319), Qwen3.5-9B: 35.3 (#213)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
SciCode—27.5%
LiveBench Coding15.5%—
LMArena Coding1093—
HumanEval+59.1%—
MBPP+54.2%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: —, Qwen3.5-9B: 14.4 (#143)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
Terminal-Bench—9.2%

Reasoning Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 13.6 (#326), Qwen3.5-9B: 22.5 (#178)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
Chess Puzzles0%12%
CritPt—0.3%
LiveBench Reasoning26.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1072—
DTBench—71.2%
LiveBench Data Analysis34.7%—
LMCA—24.5%
Adversarial NLI52.8%—
BIG-Bench Hard71.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.45
HellaSwag76.7%—
LiveBench22.4%—
WinoGrande70.8%—

Math Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 24.5 (#258), Qwen3.5-9B: 33.5 (#174)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—48.5%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—61.7%
LiveBench Math15.7%—
LMArena Math1111—

Knowledge Qwen3.5-9B leads

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.9 (#241), Qwen3.5-9B: 46.0 (#77)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
GPQA Diamond—79%
LMArena Expert1045—
ARC (AI2) Challenge84.9%—
MMLU68.8%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA64%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 26.5 (#275), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Non-English1021—
LMArena Chinese1021—
LMArena French1075—
LMArena German1044—
LMArena Japanese935—
LMArena Korean905—
LMArena Russian1022—
LMArena Spanish1084—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 48.0 (#298), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LiveBench Instruction Following39.1%—
LMArena Instruction Following1053—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 31.7 (#271), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Longer Query1044—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct: 27.7 (#295), Qwen3.5-9B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Mini 4k InstructQwen3.5-9B
LMArena Text1073—
LMArena Creative Writing1037—
LMArena Multi-Turn1018—
LiveBench Language9.2%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct better than Qwen3.5-9B?

Qwen3.5-9B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 27.4 on the Noometry Index.

Is Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct or Qwen3.5-9B better for coding?

Qwen3.5-9B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 26.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct and Qwen3.5-9B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Phi 3 Mini 4k Instruct has 35 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5-9B has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper