Model comparison

phi-3-small 7.4B vs Qwen3.6 Plus

Qwen3.6 Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#54); phi-3-small 7.4B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

47.3

Rank #54 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.

Side by side

phi-3-small 7.4B and Qwen3.6 Plus specifications
phi-3-small 7.4BQwen3.6 Plus
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index—47.3
Released—2026-03-31
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.50
Output $ / M tokens—$3
Results tracked137

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

phi-3-small 7.4B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 40.6 (#125)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-small 7.4BQwen3.6 Plus
SWE-bench Verified—57.9%
LMArena WebDev—1461
SciCode—40.7%
LMArena Coding—1467
ALE-Bench—670.15

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

phi-3-small 7.4B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-small 7.4BQwen3.6 Plus
Vending-Bench 2—5,115

Reasoning Not comparable

phi-3-small 7.4B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 28.5 (#89)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-small 7.4BQwen3.6 Plus
Epoch Capabilities Index121.79147.67
NYT Connections (extended)—60.3%
CritPt—2.9%
Chess Puzzles—17%
Thematic Generalization—59.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1449
Mystery Game Puzzles—12%
DTBench—81.9%
LMCA—33.1%

Math Not comparable

phi-3-small 7.4B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 50.6 (#44)

Math benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-small 7.4BQwen3.6 Plus
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—38.2%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%
LMArena Math—1450
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—26.2%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—8.3%

Knowledge Not comparable

phi-3-small 7.4B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 56.1 (#40)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-small 7.4BQwen3.6 Plus
GPQA Diamond—88.4%
SimpleQA Verified—44.1%
LMArena Expert—1456

Multilingual Not comparable

phi-3-small 7.4B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 53.5 (#66)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-small 7.4BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Non-English—1424
LMArena Chinese—1478
LMArena French—1454
LMArena German—1451
LMArena Japanese—1389
LMArena Korean—1381
LMArena Russian—1434
LMArena Spanish—1432

Instruction Following Not comparable

phi-3-small 7.4B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 75.2 (#70)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-small 7.4BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following—1425

Long Context Not comparable

phi-3-small 7.4B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 45.1 (#48)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-small 7.4BQwen3.6 Plus
CL-bench—20.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1440

Writing & Preference Not comparable

phi-3-small 7.4B: —, Qwen3.6 Plus: 62.4 (#78)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmarkphi-3-small 7.4BQwen3.6 Plus
LMArena Text—1437
LMArena Creative Writing—1405
LMArena Multi-Turn—1438

Frequently asked questions

Is phi-3-small 7.4B better than Qwen3.6 Plus?

Qwen3.6 Plus has enough public results to be ranked (#54); phi-3-small 7.4B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do phi-3-small 7.4B and Qwen3.6 Plus share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. phi-3-small 7.4B has 1 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Plus has 37.

Related comparisons

Go deeper