Model comparison

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct vs Qwen3.7 Flash

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

28.8

Rank #310 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Flash Alibaba (Qwen)

39.5

Rank #152 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Flash leads 48.9 to 28.5.
  • Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash specifications
Phi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.7 Flash
ProviderMicrosoftAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index28.839.5
Released2024-04-232026-07-15
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.03
Output $ / M tokens—$0.13
Results tracked327

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.4 (#313), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Coding20.3%—
LMArena Coding1102—

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.2 (#319), Qwen3.7 Flash: 27.3 (#108)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.7 Flash
NYT Connections (extended)—43.8%
Chess Puzzles—23%
LiveBench Reasoning15.9%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1100—
Mystery Game Puzzles—15%
LiveBench Data Analysis30.3%—
Adversarial NLI58.1%—
BIG-Bench Hard79.1%—
Epoch Capabilities Index—144.62
HellaSwag77%—
LiveBench24%—
WinoGrande81.5%—

Math Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 25.4 (#247), Qwen3.7 Flash: 37.3 (#100)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.7 Flash
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—19.3%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—86.7%
LiveBench Math17.6%—
LMArena Math1151—

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Flash leads

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#237), Qwen3.7 Flash: 48.9 (#69)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.7 Flash
GPQA Diamond—82.3%
LMArena Expert1067—
ARC (AI2) Challenge90.7%—
MMLU75.7%—
OpenBookQA88%—
TriviaQA58.1%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.6 (#267), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Non-English1058—
LMArena Chinese1061—
LMArena French1134—
LMArena German1080—
LMArena Japanese966—
LMArena Korean894—
LMArena Russian1111—
LMArena Spanish1111—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 52.2 (#287), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.7 Flash
LiveBench Instruction Following47.2%—
LMArena Instruction Following1087—

Long Context Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#262), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Longer Query1088—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.3 (#279), Qwen3.7 Flash: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPhi 3 Small 8k InstructQwen3.7 Flash
LMArena Text1110—
LMArena Creative Writing1083—
LMArena Multi-Turn1068—
LiveBench Language12.9%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better than Qwen3.7 Flash?

Qwen3.7 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.5 to 28.8 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct and Qwen3.7 Flash share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Flash has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper