Model comparison

Pixtral 12B vs Qwen3.7 Max

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Pixtral 12B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Pixtral 12B Mistral AI

30.8

Unranked Sparse

Qwen3.7 Max Alibaba (Qwen)

51.4

Rank #35 Confirmed

Summary

  • Pixtral 12B is cheaper at $0.15 / $0.15 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $7.50 for Qwen3.7 Max.
  • Qwen3.7 Max accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 128K.
  • Pixtral 12B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Pixtral 12B and Qwen3.7 Max specifications
Pixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
ProviderMistral AIAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index30.851.4
Released2024-09-012026-05-19
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window128K1M
Max output128K131K
Input $ / M tokens$0.15$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.15$7.50
Results tracked233

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Pixtral 12B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 50.2 (#43)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
SWE-bench Verified—77.3%
LMArena WebDev—1515
SciCode—48.8%
LMArena Coding—1498
ALE-Bench—1,189

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Pixtral 12B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 21.8 (#129)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
GBAEval—0.4%

Reasoning Not comparable

Pixtral 12B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 48.4 (#36)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
SimpleBench—70.4%
NYT Connections (extended)—85.1%
CritPt—13.4%
Chess Puzzles—19%
EBR-Bench—9.5%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1483
Mystery Game Puzzles—32%
DTBench—92.3%
LMCA—44%
Epoch Capabilities Index—153.74

Math Not comparable

Pixtral 12B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 62.3 (#26)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—64.6%
FrontierMath Tier 4—34.1%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—95.6%
ProofBench—26%
LMArena Math—1488

Knowledge Not comparable

Pixtral 12B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 61.7 (#24)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
GPQA Diamond—90.9%
SimpleQA Verified—55.8%
LMArena Expert—1488

Multimodal Not comparable

Pixtral 12B: 23.4 (#122), Qwen3.7 Max: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Vision1008—
GeoBench37%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Pixtral 12B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 57.1 (#13)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Non-English—1475
LMArena Chinese—1533
LMArena Russian—1482

Instruction Following Not comparable

Pixtral 12B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 76.9 (#34)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Instruction Following—1460

Long Context Not comparable

Pixtral 12B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 45.4 (#34)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Longer Query—1484

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Pixtral 12B: —, Qwen3.7 Max: 65.2 (#52)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkPixtral 12BQwen3.7 Max
LMArena Text—1476
LMArena Creative Writing—1450
EQ-Bench 4—1110
LMArena Multi-Turn—1482

Frequently asked questions

Is Pixtral 12B better than Qwen3.7 Max?

Qwen3.7 Max has enough public results to be ranked (#35); Pixtral 12B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Which is cheaper, Pixtral 12B or Qwen3.7 Max?

Pixtral 12B is cheaper. It lists at $0.15 per million input tokens and $0.15 per million output tokens; Qwen3.7 Max lists at $2.50 and $7.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Qwen3.7 Max does, with 1M tokens against 128K.

How many benchmarks do Pixtral 12B and Qwen3.7 Max share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Pixtral 12B has 2 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Max has 33.

Related comparisons

Go deeper