Model comparison
Qwen Max vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Max scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Max leads 47.8 to 30.5.
- Wizardlm 13b has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen Max | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 34.7 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-04-03 | — |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |
| Context window | 33K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $1.60 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $6.40 | — |
| Results tracked | 23 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Qwen Max: 30.7 (#292), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1288 | 1035 |
| Aider Polyglot | 21.8% | — |
Reasoning Qwen Max leads
Qwen Max: 25.1 (#151), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1269 | 1018 |
Math Wizardlm 13b leads
Qwen Max: 22.3 (#276), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1275 | 1017 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 16.1% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 67.2% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen Max: 30.3 (#228), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 56.1% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1248 | — |
Multilingual Qwen Max leads
Qwen Max: 41.8 (#202), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1263 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1254 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1254 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1205 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1274 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1290 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen Max leads
Qwen Max: 66.5 (#208), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1262 | 1048 |
Long Context Qwen Max leads
Qwen Max: 39.4 (#180), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1288 | 1054 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 66.7% | — |
Writing & Preference Qwen Max leads
Qwen Max: 47.8 (#205), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen Max | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1282 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1248 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1277 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Max better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 34.7 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen Max or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (30.7 vs 30.1); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Max and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Max has 23 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.