Model comparison
Qwen Plus vs Qwen2.5-Max
Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen Plus scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5-Max in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen2.5-Max leads 34.3 to 22.0.
Side by side
| Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 36.7 | 40.1 |
| Released | 2024-01-25 | 2025-01-25 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Proprietary |
| Context window | 1M | — |
| Max output | 33K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.40 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1.20 | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 27 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen2.5-Max leads
Qwen Plus: 38.3 (#163), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.2 (#118)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1328 | 1359 |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 64.4% |
Reasoning Qwen Plus leads
Qwen Plus: 27.6 (#101), Qwen2.5-Max: 24.6 (#144)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1317 | 1360 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 63.3% | — |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 51.4% |
| DTBench | 81.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 67.9% |
| LMCA | 24% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 132.54 |
| LiveBench | — | 62.3% |
Math Qwen2.5-Max leads
Qwen Plus: 22.0 (#266), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.3 (#162)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1326 | 1369 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 17.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 58.4% |
| MATH Level 5 | 65.3% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 1.7% | — |
Knowledge Qwen2.5-Max leads
Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#245), Qwen2.5-Max: 34.8 (#181)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1328 | 1337 |
| GPQA Diamond | 48.1% | — |
| Confabulations | — | 21.8% |
Multilingual Qwen2.5-Max leads
Qwen Plus: 45.3 (#170), Qwen2.5-Max: 48.3 (#140)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1310 | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1347 | 1382 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1251 | 1299 |
| LMArena Russian | 1323 | 1353 |
| LMArena French | — | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1350 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1304 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1377 |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5-Max leads
Qwen Plus: 69.0 (#176), Qwen2.5-Max: 71.5 (#147)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1303 | 1335 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 75.3% |
Long Context Qwen2.5-Max leads
Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#153), Qwen2.5-Max: 41.3 (#137)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1325 | 1358 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5-Max leads
Qwen Plus: 52.4 (#171), Qwen2.5-Max: 55.6 (#141)
| Benchmark | Qwen Plus | Qwen2.5-Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1326 | 1367 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1293 | 1339 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1336 | 1364 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 72.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 56.3% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen Plus better than Qwen2.5-Max?
Qwen2.5-Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.1 to 36.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen Plus or Qwen2.5-Max better for coding?
Qwen2.5-Max scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.2 versus 38.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen Plus and Qwen2.5-Max share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen Plus has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Max has 27.