Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.2 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 36.3 to 33.0.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 34.2 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | — |
| LMArena French | 1151 | — |
| LMArena German | 1123 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1142 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (34.2 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.