Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Step 5 Preview
Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
StepFunSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Step 5 Preview leads 50.6 to 32.4.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 43.8 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | 2026-09-16 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1.02M |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $2.70 |
| Results tracked | 20 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 5 Preview leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260), Step 5 Preview: 50.6 (#40)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1569 |
| SciCode | — | 58.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192), Step 5 Preview: 38.0 (#58)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 20.9% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | — |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199), Step 5 Preview: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217), Step 5 Preview: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245), Step 5 Preview: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | — |
| LMArena French | 1150 | — |
| LMArena German | 1123 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1141 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247), Step 5 Preview: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237), Step 5 Preview: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250), Step 5 Preview: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Step 5 Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Step 5 Preview?
Step 5 Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.8 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Step 5 Preview better for coding?
Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.6 versus 32.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Step 5 Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 3.