Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 7 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen1.5-110B leads 38.1 to 30.7.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260), Wizardlm 13b: 29.6 (#293)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192), Wizardlm 13b: 18.5 (#265)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 1018 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199), Wizardlm 13b: 27.8 (#235)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1017 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | — |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245), Wizardlm 13b: 27.3 (#272)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1023 |
| LMArena French | 1150 | — |
| LMArena German | 1123 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1141 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247), Wizardlm 13b: 53.7 (#280)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 1049 |
Long Context Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#268)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250), Wizardlm 13b: 30.7 (#282)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 1090 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1047 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen1.5-110B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.