Model comparison
Qwen1.5-110B vs Yi-Lightning
Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-110B scores higher in 1 category and Yi-Lightning in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Yi-Lightning leads 50.4 to 38.1.
- Qwen1.5-110B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | 01.AI |
| Noometry Index | 33.6 | 36.5 |
| Released | 2024-04-25 | 2024-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 20 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-110B leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 32.4 (#260), Yi-Lightning: 27.0 (#315)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1184 | 1313 |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 12.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 44.4% | — |
Reasoning Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 21.7 (#192), Yi-Lightning: 24.9 (#137)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1168 | 1302 |
| ForecastBench | 57.7 | — |
Math Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 31.1 (#199), Yi-Lightning: 33.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1185 | 1300 |
Knowledge Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 30.7 (#217), Yi-Lightning: 34.8 (#182)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1144 | 1286 |
Multilingual Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 33.8 (#245), Yi-Lightning: 42.4 (#191)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1142 | 1269 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1206 | 1320 |
| LMArena French | 1150 | 1304 |
| LMArena German | 1123 | 1267 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1074 | 1228 |
| LMArena Korean | 1044 | 1192 |
| LMArena Russian | 1118 | 1255 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1141 | 1315 |
Instruction Following Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 60.6 (#247), Yi-Lightning: 67.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1158 | 1278 |
Long Context Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 35.0 (#237), Yi-Lightning: 39.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1157 | 1297 |
Writing & Preference Yi-Lightning leads
Qwen1.5-110B: 38.1 (#250), Yi-Lightning: 50.4 (#178)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-110B | Yi-Lightning |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1175 | 1302 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1148 | 1280 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1160 | 1311 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-110B better than Yi-Lightning?
Yi-Lightning is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 33.6 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-110B or Yi-Lightning better for coding?
Qwen1.5-110B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 32.4 versus 27.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-110B and Yi-Lightning share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-110B has 20 scored results on Noometry and Yi-Lightning has 18.