Model comparison
Qwen1.5-14B vs Wizardlm 70b
Qwen1.5-14B and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.7 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-14B scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 32.7 | 33.0 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 17 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.1 (#263), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1138 | 1081 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen1.5-14B: 21.4 (#223), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1113 | 1079 |
Math Too close to call
Qwen1.5-14B: 32.4 (#215), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1125 | 1116 |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-14B: 29.8 (#232), Wizardlm 70b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1094 | — |
| MMLU | 68.6% | — |
Multilingual Qwen1.5-14B leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 30.7 (#262), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1095 | 1078 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1147 | 1052 |
| LMArena German | 1043 | 1083 |
| LMArena Russian | 1046 | 1155 |
| LMArena French | 1116 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1019 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1085 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Qwen1.5-14B: 56.8 (#271), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1102 | 1093 |
Long Context Too close to call
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.7 (#257), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1113 | 1097 |
Writing & Preference Wizardlm 70b leads
Qwen1.5-14B: 33.6 (#276), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-14B | Wizardlm 70b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1128 | 1120 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1091 | 1149 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1110 | 1108 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-14B better than Wizardlm 70b?
Qwen1.5-14B and Wizardlm 70b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (32.7 vs 33.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Qwen1.5-14B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?
Qwen1.5-14B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.1 versus 31.4 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-14B and Wizardlm 70b share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-14B has 17 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.