Model comparison
Qwen1.5-32B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 35.8 to 31.1.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 30.0 | 33.8 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 21 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen1.5-32B: 31.1 (#278), Qwen3 Coder Next: 35.8 (#206)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 32.3% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1155 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 42% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Qwen1.5-32B: 20.9 (#210), Qwen3 Coder Next: 21.7 (#191)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1131 | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 30.5 (#207), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1155 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 13.5 (#291), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 30.7% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1126 | — |
| MMLU | 74.4% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 31.6 (#254), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1106 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1176 | — |
| LMArena French | 1100 | — |
| LMArena German | 1058 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1027 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1007 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1089 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 58.0 (#260), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1116 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 34.7 (#241), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1146 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen1.5-32B: 34.4 (#266), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1137 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1083 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1140 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-32B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.8 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-32B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.8 versus 31.1 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-32B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-32B has 21 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.