Model comparison
Qwen1.5-7B vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
UpstageSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen1.5-7B scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Solar Pro4 leads 56.7 to 29.8.
- Qwen1.5-7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Qwen1.5-7B | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Upstage |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 41.5 |
| Released | 2024-02-04 | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 13 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 31.6 (#271), Solar Pro4: 39.9 (#135)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1107 | 1439 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 19.5 (#237), Solar Pro4: 27.3 (#107)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1066 | 1398 |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.0 (#222), Solar Pro4: 36.1 (#129)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1080 | 1418 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.2 (#239), Solar Pro4: 39.0 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1055 | 1421 |
| MMLU | 62.6% | — |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 28.6 (#266), Solar Pro4: 49.0 (#134)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1058 | 1362 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1140 | 1417 |
| LMArena Russian | 1006 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | — | 1403 |
| LMArena German | — | 1351 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1300 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1408 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 54.4 (#276), Solar Pro4: 72.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1058 | 1376 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 33.1 (#261), Solar Pro4: 42.0 (#125)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1090 | 1379 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Qwen1.5-7B: 29.8 (#288), Solar Pro4: 56.7 (#133)
| Benchmark | Qwen1.5-7B | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1084 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1035 | 1313 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1061 | 1391 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen1.5-7B better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.5 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen1.5-7B or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 31.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen1.5-7B and Solar Pro4 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen1.5-7B has 13 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.