Model comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B vs Qwen3 Coder Next
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.4 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3 Coder Next leads 36.3 to 22.6.
- Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper at $0.12 / $0.80 per million input/output tokens, against $0.66 / $1 for Qwen2.5-Coder-32B.
- Qwen3 Coder Next accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 33K.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 34.3 |
| Released | 2024-09-18 | 2026-02-02 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 33K | 262K |
| Max output | 29K | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.66 | $0.12 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1 | $0.80 |
| Results tracked | 31 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333), Qwen3 Coder Next: 36.3 (#210)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 16.4% | — |
| SciCode | — | 32.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 34.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 56.9% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1276 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 77% | — |
Reasoning Qwen3 Coder Next leads
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225), Qwen3 Coder Next: 22.4 (#196)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 42.1% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.49 | — |
| HellaSwag | 83% | — |
| LiveBench | 46.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.8% | — |
Math Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 46.6% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
| GSM8K | 93% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1221 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 70.5% | — |
| MMLU | 79.1% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1222 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1228 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.7% | — |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1223 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240), Qwen3 Coder Next: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Qwen3 Coder Next |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1230 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1174 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1222 | — |
| LiveBench Language | 23.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better than Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Qwen3 Coder Next score almost the same on the Noometry Index (33.4 vs 34.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Qwen3 Coder Next?
Qwen3 Coder Next is cheaper. It lists at $0.12 per million input tokens and $0.80 per million output tokens; Qwen2.5-Coder-32B lists at $0.66 and $1.
Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Qwen3 Coder Next better for coding?
Qwen3 Coder Next scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.3 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Qwen3 Coder Next does, with 262K tokens against 33K.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Qwen3 Coder Next share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 Coder Next has 3.