Model comparison
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B vs Wizardlm 13b
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Alibaba (Qwen)
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B scores higher in 6 categories and Wizardlm 13b in 1 category; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads 41.6 to 30.5.
Side by side
| Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 13b | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 33.4 | 31.4 |
| Released | 2024-09-18 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 33K | — |
| Max output | 29K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.66 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $1 | — |
| Results tracked | 31 | 10 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Wizardlm 13b leads
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 22.6 (#333), Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1276 | 1035 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 9% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 16.4% | — |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 49% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 56.9% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 58% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 87.2% | — |
| MBPP+ | 77% | — |
Reasoning Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 21.2 (#225), Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1251 | 1018 |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 42.1% | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 49.9% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 119.49 | — |
| HellaSwag | 83% | — |
| LiveBench | 46.2% | — |
| WinoGrande | 80.8% | — |
Math Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.3 (#204), Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1017 |
| LiveBench Math | 46.6% | — |
| GSM8K | 93% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 33.4 (#203), Wizardlm 13b: —
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1221 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 70.5% | — |
| MMLU | 79.1% | — |
Multilingual Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 37.8 (#235), Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1205 | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1222 | 1023 |
| LMArena Russian | 1228 | — |
Instruction Following Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 61.4 (#245), Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1223 | 1048 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 58.7% | — |
Long Context Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 38.0 (#208), Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1251 | 1054 |
Writing & Preference Qwen2.5-Coder-32B leads
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B: 41.6 (#240), Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)
| Benchmark | Qwen2.5-Coder-32B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1230 | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1174 | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1222 | 1047 |
| LiveBench Language | 23.3% | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B better than Wizardlm 13b?
Qwen2.5-Coder-32B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.4 to 31.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Qwen2.5-Coder-32B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?
Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 22.6 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder-32B and Wizardlm 13b share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder-32B has 31 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.