Model comparison

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) vs Qwen3.6 Max Preview

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#43); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both.
  • Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) and Qwen3.6 Max Preview specifications
Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index—51.5
Released2024-09-182026-04-20
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.30
Output $ / M tokens—$7.80
Results tracked629

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
SWE-bench Verified—76.7%
LMArena WebDev—1482
LMArena Coding—1471

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Vending-Bench 2—4,254

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
Epoch Capabilities Index113.14149.24
SimpleBench—63%
NYT Connections (extended)—74.1%
Chess Puzzles—20%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1457
Mystery Game Puzzles—19%
DTBench—87.2%
LMCA—42.5%
HellaSwag76.8%—
WinoGrande72.9%—

Math Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—91.1%
LMArena Math—1465
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—23.1%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—4.2%
GSM8K86.7%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
GPQA Diamond—87.4%
SimpleQA Verified—52%
LMArena Expert—1478
ARC (AI2) Challenge60.9%—
MMLU68%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Non-English—1437
LMArena Chinese—1487
LMArena French—1449
LMArena Russian—1445
LMArena Spanish—1454

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Instruction Following—1438

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Longer Query—1457

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —, Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)Qwen3.6 Max Preview
LMArena Text—1447
LMArena Creative Writing—1435
LMArena Multi-Turn—1456

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) better than Qwen3.6 Max Preview?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#43); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) and Qwen3.6 Max Preview share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29.

Related comparisons

Go deeper