Model comparison

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 vs Qwen3-30B-A3B

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Qwen3-30B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 38.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 Alibaba (Qwen)

38.8

Rank #181 Confirmed

Qwen3-30B-A3B Alibaba (Qwen)

38.9

Rank #179 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-30B-A3B in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in long context, where Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads 39.2 to 31.0.
  • Qwen3-30B-A3B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Qwen3-30B-A3B specifications
Qwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3-30B-A3B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index38.838.9
Released—2025-04-28
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window—41K
Max output—16K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.12
Output $ / M tokens—$0.50
Results tracked1432

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Too close to call

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 38.5 (#175), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.5 (#194)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Coding13141416
SciCode—33.3%
WeirdML—29.8%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: —, Qwen3-30B-A3B: 29.8 (#82)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3-30B-A3B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—41.4%

Reasoning Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 25.9 (#141), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 22.2 (#204)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Hard Prompts12991398
Kagi LLM Benchmark—54.9%
CritPt—0.3%
Chess Puzzles—8%
DTBench—69.3%
LMCA—22.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—139.63

Math Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 36.1 (#174), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 37.4 (#157)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Math12981394
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—47.8%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—70.3%

Knowledge Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 35.5 (#183), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 41.8 (#105)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Expert12891396
GPQA Diamond—70.1%
Confabulations—12.3%

Multilingual Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 41.9 (#201), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 49.5 (#132)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Non-English12651372
LMArena Chinese13141433
LMArena German12311380
LMArena Japanese12071337
LMArena Russian12711370
LMArena French—1418
LMArena Korean—1331
LMArena Spanish—1404

Instruction Following Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 67.2 (#199), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 72.0 (#142)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Instruction Following12751363

Long Context Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 39.2 (#184), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 31.0 (#283)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Longer Query12921379
Fiction.LiveBench—40.6%

Writing & Preference Qwen3-30B-A3B leads

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127: 49.4 (#192), Qwen3-30B-A3B: 55.6 (#143)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen2.5 Plus 1127Qwen3-30B-A3B
LMArena Text12991384
LMArena Creative Writing12621317
LMArena Multi-Turn12991378
Short-Story Creative Writing—75.3%

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 better than Qwen3-30B-A3B?

Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Qwen3-30B-A3B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (38.8 vs 38.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 or Qwen3-30B-A3B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.5 vs 37.5); test both on your own repository before choosing.

How many benchmarks do Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 and Qwen3-30B-A3B share?

14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen2.5 Plus 1127 has 14 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-30B-A3B has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper