Model comparison

Qwen3-1.7B vs Trinity Large Thinking

Trinity Large Thinking is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 26.6 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified October 12, 2026. 0 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-1.7B

Alibaba (Qwen)

26.6

Rank #336 Reported

Trinity Large Thinking

Arcee AI

38.6

Rank #185 Confirmed

Summary

The widest gap is in knowledge, where Trinity Large Thinking leads 40.9 to 19.6.

Side by side

Qwen3-1.7B and Trinity Large Thinking specifications
	Qwen3-1.7B	Trinity Large Thinking
Provider	Alibaba (Qwen)	Arcee AI
Noometry Index	26.6	38.6
Released	2025-04-29	2026-04-01
Weights	Open	Open
Context window	—	262K
Max output	—	80K
Input $ / M tokens	—	$0.25
Output $ / M tokens	—	$0.80
Results tracked	4	24

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 34.1 (#244)

Coding benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-1.7B	Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena WebDev	—	1238
SciCode	—	36.1%
LMArena Coding	—	1381

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: 24.7 (#115), Trinity Large Thinking: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-1.7B	Trinity Large Thinking
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard	28.4%	—

Reasoning Qwen3-1.7B leads

Qwen3-1.7B: 19.2 (#267), Trinity Large Thinking: 16.9 (#298)

Reasoning benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-1.7B	Trinity Large Thinking
NYT Connections (extended)	—	16.5%
CritPt	—	0.9%
Chess Puzzles	0%	—
Thematic Generalization	—	41.6%
LMArena Hard Prompts	—	1350
Surface Evolver Bench	—	15.6%

Math Trinity Large Thinking leads

Qwen3-1.7B: 16.3 (#294), Trinity Large Thinking: 37.6 (#149)

Math benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-1.7B	Trinity Large Thinking
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025	8.1%	—
LMArena Math	—	1366

Knowledge Trinity Large Thinking leads

Qwen3-1.7B: 19.6 (#278), Trinity Large Thinking: 40.9 (#113)

Knowledge benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-1.7B	Trinity Large Thinking
GPQA Diamond	38%	—
Vectara Hallucination Rate	—	6.9%
LMArena Expert	—	1360

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 46.2 (#160)

Multilingual benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-1.7B	Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Non-English	—	1325
LMArena Chinese	—	1373
LMArena French	—	1374
LMArena German	—	1356
LMArena Japanese	—	1311
LMArena Korean	—	1306
LMArena Russian	—	1337
LMArena Spanish	—	1357

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 70.5 (#162)

Instruction Following benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-1.7B	Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Instruction Following	—	1334

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 41.3 (#144)

Long Context benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-1.7B	Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Longer Query	—	1355

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3-1.7B: —, Trinity Large Thinking: 53.8 (#158)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
Benchmark	Qwen3-1.7B	Trinity Large Thinking
LMArena Text	—	1340
LMArena Creative Writing	—	1320
LMArena Multi-Turn	—	1342

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-1.7B better than Trinity Large Thinking?