Model comparison

Qwen3 235B-A22B vs Step 5 Preview

Qwen3 235B-A22B and Step 5 Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3 235B-A22B Alibaba (Qwen)

43.2

Rank #83 Confirmed

Step 5 Preview StepFun

43.8

Rank #78 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3 235B-A22B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 5 Preview in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 5 Preview leads 38.0 to 15.8.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is CritPt: 0% for Qwen3 235B-A22B and 20.9% for Step 5 Preview.
  • Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper at $0.70 / $2.80 per million input/output tokens, against $1 / $2.70 for Step 5 Preview.
  • Step 5 Preview accepts more context: 1.02M tokens versus 131K.
  • Qwen3 235B-A22B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3 235B-A22B and Step 5 Preview specifications
Qwen3 235B-A22BStep 5 Preview
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)StepFun
Noometry Index43.243.8
Released2025-042026-09-16
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K1.02M
Max output16K66K
Input $ / M tokens$0.70$1
Output $ / M tokens$2.80$2.70
Results tracked493

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3 235B-A22B: 43.8 (#72), Step 5 Preview: 50.6 (#40)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22BStep 5 Preview
SciCode42.4%58.9%
Aider Polyglot59.6%—
LMArena WebDev—1569
WeirdML41%—
LMArena Coding1445—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3 235B-A22B: 33.7 (#48), Step 5 Preview: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22BStep 5 Preview
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard52.1%—
Vending-Bench 2-11.34—

Reasoning Step 5 Preview leads

Qwen3 235B-A22B: 15.8 (#302), Step 5 Preview: 38.0 (#58)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22BStep 5 Preview
CritPt0%20.9%
ARC-AGI-21.3%—
SimpleBench31%—
Kagi LLM Benchmark69.4%—
ARC-AGI-111%—
Chess Puzzles12%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1433—
Mystery Game Puzzles9%—
DTBench80.3%—
LMCA29.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index143.87—
ForecastBench59.7—

Math Not comparable

Qwen3 235B-A22B: 48.5 (#51), Step 5 Preview: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22BStep 5 Preview
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202586.7%—
Omni-MATH71.8%—
LMArena Math1431—
MATH Level 568.9%—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)8.5%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)0%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3 235B-A22B: 49.5 (#67), Step 5 Preview: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22BStep 5 Preview
GPQA Diamond80.1%—
SimpleQA Verified40.4%—
MMLU-Pro84.4%—
Confabulations15.6%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate9.3%—
GPQA (HELM)72.7%—
LMArena Expert1460—

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3 235B-A22B: 52.5 (#84), Step 5 Preview: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Non-English1410—
LMArena Chinese1481—
LMArena French1445—
LMArena German1432—
LMArena Japanese1400—
LMArena Korean1391—
LMArena Russian1411—
LMArena Spanish1429—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3 235B-A22B: 72.8 (#132), Step 5 Preview: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22BStep 5 Preview
IFEval83.5%—
LMArena Instruction Following1408—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3 235B-A22B: 46.1 (#25), Step 5 Preview: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22BStep 5 Preview
Fiction.LiveBench75%—
LMArena Longer Query1426—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3 235B-A22B: 59.8 (#103), Step 5 Preview: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3 235B-A22BStep 5 Preview
LMArena Text1419—
LMArena Creative Writing1384—
Short-Story Creative Writing83%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1366—
WildBench86.6%—
LMArena Multi-Turn1432—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3 235B-A22B better than Step 5 Preview?

Qwen3 235B-A22B and Step 5 Preview score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.2 vs 43.8), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Which is cheaper, Qwen3 235B-A22B or Step 5 Preview?

Qwen3 235B-A22B is cheaper. It lists at $0.70 per million input tokens and $2.80 per million output tokens; Step 5 Preview lists at $1 and $2.70.

Is Qwen3 235B-A22B or Step 5 Preview better for coding?

Step 5 Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 50.6 versus 43.8 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Step 5 Preview does, with 1.02M tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3 235B-A22B and Step 5 Preview share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3 235B-A22B has 49 scored results on Noometry and Step 5 Preview has 3.

Related comparisons

Go deeper