Model comparison

Qwen3-4B vs Qwen3.5 397B-A17B

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #264 Confirmed

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B Alibaba (Qwen)

46.0

Rank #67 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3-4B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads 53.3 to 33.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 52.2% for Qwen3-4B and 88.9% for Qwen3.5 397B-A17B.

Side by side

Qwen3-4B and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B specifications
Qwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index31.946.0
Released2025-04-292026-02-01
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—66K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.60
Output $ / M tokens—$3.60
Results tracked636

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 42.0 (#114)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena WebDev—1400
LMArena Coding—1465

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Qwen3-4B: 27.6 (#100), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 33.3 (#53)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
APEX-Agents—24.9%
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard35.7%—
τ²-bench Airline—81.5%
τ²-bench Banking—9.8%
τ²-bench Retail—84.4%
τ²-bench Telecom—97.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Qwen3-4B: 19.2 (#268), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 34.5 (#70)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
Chess Puzzles4%13%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—73.7%
NYT Connections (extended)—58.9%
Thematic Generalization—65.1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1448
Mystery Game Puzzles—18%
DTBench—87.5%
LMCA—37.9%
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.65

Math Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Qwen3-4B: 29.7 (#240), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 46.1 (#73)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202552.2%88.9%
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—31.2%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions38.5%—
LMArena Math—1454

Knowledge Qwen3.5 397B-A17B leads

Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#208), Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.3 (#58)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
GPQA Diamond52.3%86.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.7%—
LMArena Expert—1462

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 40.7 (#44)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Vision—1263

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 53.7 (#59)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Non-English—1430
LMArena Chinese—1500
LMArena French—1461
LMArena German—1447
LMArena Japanese—1426
LMArena Korean—1384
LMArena Russian—1429
LMArena Spanish—1441

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 75.0 (#77)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Instruction Following—1424

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 44.1 (#74)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Longer Query—1442

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3-4B: —, Qwen3.5 397B-A17B: 62.3 (#79)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3-4BQwen3.5 397B-A17B
LMArena Text—1438
LMArena Creative Writing—1401
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1478
LMArena Multi-Turn—1446

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3-4B better than Qwen3.5 397B-A17B?

Qwen3.5 397B-A17B is the stronger model overall, scoring 46.0 to 31.9 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3-4B and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3-4B has 6 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 397B-A17B has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper