Noometry

Model comparison

Qwen3.5 Max Preview vs Qwen3.7 Plus

Qwen3.5 Max Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.3 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.5 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #71 Confirmed

Qwen3.7 Plus Alibaba (Qwen)

45.3

Rank #72 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher in 5 categories and Qwen3.7 Plus in 3 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.7 Plus leads 54.9 to 41.8.

Side by side

Qwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)Alibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index45.345.3
Released—2026-06-02
WeightsProprietaryProprietary
Context window—1M
Max output—131K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.40
Output $ / M tokens—$1.60
Results tracked1732

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77), Qwen3.7 Plus: 36.6 (#206)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Coding14871473
FrontierCode—10.2%
SciCode—45.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 21.4 (#138)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
OSWorld 2.0—2.8%

Reasoning Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84), Qwen3.7 Plus: 39.3 (#59)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Hard Prompts14831460
NYT Connections (extended)—74.8%
CritPt—9.1%
Chess Puzzles—24%
Mystery Game Puzzles—17%
DTBench—84%
LMCA—37.6%
Epoch Capabilities Index—147.37

Math Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94), Qwen3.7 Plus: 50.5 (#56)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Math14741466
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—34.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—93.3%

Knowledge Qwen3.7 Plus leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.9 (#51)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Expert14891467
GPQA Diamond—87.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: —, Qwen3.7 Plus: 41.8 (#33)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Vision—1279
LMArena Document—1444

Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22), Qwen3.7 Plus: 54.8 (#38)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Non-English14651445
LMArena Chinese15341510
LMArena French14841473
LMArena German14871471
LMArena Japanese14951413
LMArena Korean14381415
LMArena Russian14711457
LMArena Spanish14701457

Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31), Qwen3.7 Plus: 75.8 (#52)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Instruction Following14671440

Long Context Too close to call

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45), Qwen3.7 Plus: 44.5 (#65)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Longer Query14761455

Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41), Qwen3.7 Plus: 64.3 (#56)

BenchmarkQwen3.5 Max PreviewQwen3.7 Plus
LMArena Text14701455
LMArena Creative Writing14641439
LMArena Multi-Turn14781460

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.5 Max Preview better than Qwen3.7 Plus?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus score almost the same on the Noometry Index (45.3 vs 45.3), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

Is Qwen3.5 Max Preview or Qwen3.7 Plus better for coding?

Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 36.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.5 Max Preview and Qwen3.7 Plus share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.7 Plus has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper