Model comparison

Qwen3.6 Max Preview vs StarCoder 2 7B

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#43); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Qwen3.6 Max Preview Alibaba (Qwen)

51.5

Rank #43 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 7B NVIDIA

37.0

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher in 1 category and StarCoder 2 7B in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads 48.7 to 34.8.
  • StarCoder 2 7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Qwen3.6 Max Preview and StarCoder 2 7B specifications
Qwen3.6 Max PreviewStarCoder 2 7B
ProviderAlibaba (Qwen)NVIDIA
Noometry Index51.537.0
Released2026-04-202024-02-20
WeightsProprietaryOpen
Context window262K—
Max output66K—
Input $ / M tokens$1.30—
Output $ / M tokens$7.80—
Results tracked297

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Qwen3.6 Max Preview leads

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 48.7 (#54), StarCoder 2 7B: 34.8

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewStarCoder 2 7B
SWE-bench Verified76.7%—
LMArena WebDev1482—
LMArena Coding1471—
BigCodeBench Complete—27.7%
HumanEval+—29.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: —, StarCoder 2 7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewStarCoder 2 7B
Vending-Bench 24,254—

Reasoning Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 41.7 (#53), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewStarCoder 2 7B
Epoch Capabilities Index149.2493.56
SimpleBench63%—
NYT Connections (extended)74.1%—
Chess Puzzles20%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1457—
Mystery Game Puzzles19%—
DTBench87.2%—
LMCA42.5%—
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.1 (#46), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewStarCoder 2 7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202591.1%—
LMArena Math1465—
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)23.1%—
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)4.2%—
GSM8K—32.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 57.6 (#39), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewStarCoder 2 7B
GPQA Diamond87.4%—
SimpleQA Verified52%—
LMArena Expert1478—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—38.7%
MMLU—38.8%

Multilingual Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 54.2 (#48), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Non-English1437—
LMArena Chinese1487—
LMArena French1449—
LMArena Russian1445—
LMArena Spanish1454—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 75.7 (#55), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Instruction Following1438—

Long Context Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 44.6 (#61), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Longer Query1457—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Qwen3.6 Max Preview: 63.8 (#60), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkQwen3.6 Max PreviewStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Text1447—
LMArena Creative Writing1435—
LMArena Multi-Turn1456—

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview better than StarCoder 2 7B?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview has enough public results to be ranked (#43); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Qwen3.6 Max Preview or StarCoder 2 7B better for coding?

Qwen3.6 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 48.7 versus 34.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Qwen3.6 Max Preview and StarCoder 2 7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Qwen3.6 Max Preview has 29 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 7B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper